Can psychopaths get amok?

Okay so, I had to google this word.

‘A psychic disturbance characterized by depression followed by a manic urge to murder.'

From my point of view, no. As far as I am aware, based on evidence and anecdotal experience, we are immune to depression. So that's one half of the definition out of the way.

Secondly, a manic urge. Mania is showing wild, apparently deranged, excitement and energy. We are 99% of the time, cool, calm and collected, we never suffer from ‘mania' or ‘manic' urges.

Lastly, speaking of urges. I'm pretty sure the urge to kill is an individual thing, most common with the low-functioning members of our ilk and high-functioning during out fleeting anger, but we can control that. High-functioning psychopaths, such as my self, usually realise that killing is useless. The downsides really outweigh the benefits, so we remove it from our train of thought as it's not a route we can take.

In conclusion, we wouldn't have the psychiatric effects but it is possible we would have the urge to kill but it's very unlikely if they're high functioning.


Running amok, sometimes referred to as simply amok or gone amok,[1] also spelled amuk, from the Malay language,[2] is "an episode of sudden mass assault against people or objects usually by a single individual following a period of brooding that has traditionally been regarded as occurring especially in Malay culture but is now increasingly viewed as psychopathological behavior"

Running amok - Wikipedia

Judging by this, I can shorten it to going on a bloodlust rampage. This does not happen with me. If I decide to hurt someone, it's an intentional and carefully considered decision. I don't do impulsiveness. Not anymore.

However, the closest thing to amok that I can come to is an instinctive reaction. However, this doesn't qualify as amok as going amok is usually for a prolonged period of time, as opposed to the instinctive reaction which lasts mere seconds.

Should the US accept Syrian refugees?

The answer to this question has proven to be incredibly controversial, especially after the Paris terror attack, with 31 American governors publicly refusing to grant Syrians refuge. IN short: it's absurd to believe that Syrian refugees pose a danger. S0-yes, we should

Why are first loves so strong?

Because there won't be another and another if you hold onto them.By holding onto your first love you can become obsessed with the feeling of lack or admiration for someone of whom could not see you for the divine creature that you are.And so,

How would Vietnam be different if it had been colonized by India instead of the French?

Downvoted and reported this question and the similar ones for repeated harassment.•How would Vietnam be different if it had been colonized by England instead of the French?•How would Vietnam be different if it had been colonized by Japan instead of the French?•How would Vietnam be different if it had been