Do psychopaths who are also serial killers deserve to live?
This is a tricky question that honestly cannot be answered with a simple yes or no. It all depends on each individuals morality standings. On one hand, this killer took the lives of multiple other people, so perhaps the only way to achieve real justice is to take their life as well. Seems fair. On the other hand, is it really "just" to essentially get revenge on this person by using the law to murder them? Does this make us just as bad as the killer? Is it moral for the criminal justice system to take someone's life? If they can decide this person is to be killed, then that means anyone could be in this same situation. What if they are innocent and they are killed anyways? I don't know the answers. These are the kinds of things we have to think about when considering what people "deserve".
"If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?"-Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn,
It depends on the setting. Truth be told, any name can be good for an archer character, because the name doesn't necessarily have to describe the character, and I'm personally of the opinion that authors who name their archer characters Fletcher or their knight characters names like Trueheart or Shieldbearer or whatnot
Stop generalizing. There are a LOT of Indian men. Some are attractive. Some are not. Work on your game and you'll spend more time being attractive and less time trying to predict your attractiveness on Quora.PS I am a young fit Indian-American man. I slept with more than 30 very attractive women before I was 26.